HomeNorth CarolinaGreensboro Water Hardness › Water Quality

Is Greensboro Water Safe to Drink?

City of Greensboro Water Resources · 2025 data · official source

Water droplet with a checkmark — Greensboro water safe to drink — Greensboro, NC

This is the safety page for Greensboro — how hard the water is (and what that costs) lives on the Greensboro water hardness page · see how Greensboro compares across all of North Carolina on the North Carolina hardness guide · or browse every North Carolina city by safety status on the North Carolina water quality page.

⚠️ Check before you drink

Greensboro's water has Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) above the EPA legal limit. See the breakdown below and consider a filter rated for that contaminant.

What's in Greensboro's water

Detected contaminants reported for City of Greensboro (EPA system ID NC0241010).

Source: EWG tap water database (Aug 2026).

⚠️ Exceeds EPA legal limit

Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) exceeds the EPA legal limit. This is worth investigating — a filter rated for that contaminant may be appropriate.

How to read this table: the legal limit (the EPA's Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)) is the enforceable safety line — it's what regulators actually require. The EWG guideline column is a much stricter, voluntary health benchmark (often 100–1000× lower than the legal limit). Many contaminants sit below the legal limit but above the EWG line — that's common nationwide and means the water is still legally safe, not that it's dangerous.

● Below limit — below both the EWG and the legal MCL limit● Above EWG — above the EWG line, but below the legal limit● Above limit — above the EWG and the legal MCL limit
ContaminantTypical levelEPA legal limitEWG guidelineStatus
Bromodichloromethane6.17 ppbunregulated0.06 ppbAbove EWG
Chloroform27.6 ppbunregulated0.4 ppbAbove EWG
Chromium (hexavalent)0.112 ppbunregulated0.02 ppbAbove EWG
Dibromoacetic acid0.083 ppbunregulated0.03 ppbAbove EWG
Dibromochloromethane0.736 ppbunregulated0.1 ppbAbove EWG
Dichloroacetic acid11.1 ppbunregulated0.2 ppbAbove EWG
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)21.6 ppb60 ppb0.1 ppbBelow limit
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)60.3 ppbunregulated0.06 ppbAbove EWG
Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA)0.19 pptunregulated0.006 pptAbove EWG
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)11.1 ppt10 ppt0.001 pptAbove limit
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)0.35 ppt10 ppt0.006 pptBelow limit
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)34.5 ppb80 ppb0.15 ppbBelow limit
Trichloroacetic acid9.62 ppbunregulated0.1 ppbAbove EWG

Levels are system-wide utility averages. The legal limit is the EPA's Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). EWG also flags 15 contaminant(s) as exceeding its own stricter (non-legal) health guideline — shown as an informational note only, not a safety claim.

Not sure what these levels mean for your health? Read our complete contaminants guide — what's detected vs. what matters, and how to read the numbers.

What actually matters in Greensboro's water

Laboratory test vial with magnifying glass — Greensboro water contaminant testing — Greensboro water testing

Most of the numbers in the table are below the legal limit and aren't worth your worry. Here's the honest read on the ones people actually ask about in Greensboro:

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) — 34.5 ppb vs 80 ppb (0.080 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Trihalomethanes are disinfection byproducts. Long-term exposure above the limit is associated with liver, kidney, and central nervous system problems plus an increased risk of cancer (most consistently bladder). The limit is a deliberate trade-off: you can't remove them without abandoning disinfection, which would risk far worse microbial disease.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) — 21.6 ppb vs 60 ppb (0.060 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Haloacetic acids are disinfection byproducts associated with an increased risk of cancer at sustained elevated exposure. Same trade-off as TTHMs — the limit balances cancer risk against the necessity of disinfection.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Chromium (hexavalent) — 0.112 ppb vs 100 ppb (0.1 mg/L) total (EPA MCL)

Why the limit exists: Chromium-6 (the hexavalent form) is a known carcinogen when inhaled and is associated with stomach and intestinal tumors in drinking-water studies; the total-chromium MCL covers all forms. The basis is allergic dermatitis plus the cancer concern from the hexavalent form.
Source: EPA MCL

Bromodichloromethane — 6.17 ppb vs 80 ppb (0.080 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Trihalomethanes are disinfection byproducts. Long-term exposure above the limit is associated with liver, kidney, and central nervous system problems plus an increased risk of cancer (most consistently bladder). The limit is a deliberate trade-off: you can't remove them without abandoning disinfection, which would risk far worse microbial disease.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Chloroform — 27.6 ppb vs 80 ppb (0.080 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Trihalomethanes are disinfection byproducts. Long-term exposure above the limit is associated with liver, kidney, and central nervous system problems plus an increased risk of cancer (most consistently bladder). The limit is a deliberate trade-off: you can't remove them without abandoning disinfection, which would risk far worse microbial disease.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Dibromoacetic acid — 0.0833 ppb vs 60 ppb (0.060 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Haloacetic acids are disinfection byproducts associated with an increased risk of cancer at sustained elevated exposure. Same trade-off as TTHMs — the limit balances cancer risk against the necessity of disinfection.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Dibromochloromethane — 0.736 ppb vs 80 ppb (0.080 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Trihalomethanes are disinfection byproducts. Long-term exposure above the limit is associated with liver, kidney, and central nervous system problems plus an increased risk of cancer (most consistently bladder). The limit is a deliberate trade-off: you can't remove them without abandoning disinfection, which would risk far worse microbial disease.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Dichloroacetic acid — 11.1 ppb vs 60 ppb (0.060 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Haloacetic acids are disinfection byproducts associated with an increased risk of cancer at sustained elevated exposure. Same trade-off as TTHMs — the limit balances cancer risk against the necessity of disinfection.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) — 60.3 ppb vs 60 ppb (0.060 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Haloacetic acids are disinfection byproducts associated with an increased risk of cancer at sustained elevated exposure. Same trade-off as TTHMs — the limit balances cancer risk against the necessity of disinfection.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) — 0.19 ppt vs PFOA/PFOS 4 ppt; PFHxS/PFNA/GenX 10 ppt (EPA MCL (2024))

Why the limit exists: PFAS are "forever chemicals" — extremely persistent. The limits exist because several PFAS are linked to cardiovascular, immune, liver, and thyroid effects, elevated cholesterol (PFNA), and increased incidence of certain cancers (kidney/testicular for PFOA, liver for PFOS). Note: the EPA has proposed revising parts of the individual PFAS MCLs; the underlying health-science rationale is unchanged regardless of the current legal number.
Who it matters most for: Pregnant women, infants, and children (developmental and immune effects).
Source: EPA MCL (2024)

Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) — 11.1 ppt vs PFOA/PFOS 4 ppt; PFHxS/PFNA/GenX 10 ppt (EPA MCL (2024)) — ABOVE LIMIT

Why the limit exists: PFAS are "forever chemicals" — extremely persistent. The limits exist because several PFAS are linked to cardiovascular, immune, liver, and thyroid effects, elevated cholesterol (PFNA), and increased incidence of certain cancers (kidney/testicular for PFOA, liver for PFOS). Note: the EPA has proposed revising parts of the individual PFAS MCLs; the underlying health-science rationale is unchanged regardless of the current legal number.
Who it matters most for: Pregnant women, infants, and children (developmental and immune effects).
Source: EPA MCL (2024)

Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) — 0.35 ppt vs PFOA/PFOS 4 ppt; PFHxS/PFNA/GenX 10 ppt (EPA MCL (2024))

Why the limit exists: PFAS are "forever chemicals" — extremely persistent. The limits exist because several PFAS are linked to cardiovascular, immune, liver, and thyroid effects, elevated cholesterol (PFNA), and increased incidence of certain cancers (kidney/testicular for PFOA, liver for PFOS). Note: the EPA has proposed revising parts of the individual PFAS MCLs; the underlying health-science rationale is unchanged regardless of the current legal number.
Who it matters most for: Pregnant women, infants, and children (developmental and immune effects).
Source: EPA MCL (2024)

Trichloroacetic acid — 9.62 ppb vs 60 ppb (0.060 mg/L) (EPA MCL / HC MAC)

Why the limit exists: Haloacetic acids are disinfection byproducts associated with an increased risk of cancer at sustained elevated exposure. Same trade-off as TTHMs — the limit balances cancer risk against the necessity of disinfection.
Source: EPA MCL / HC MAC

Where Greensboro's water comes from — and how it's treated

Filtration pipeline — how Greensboro's water is treated — Greensboro water source and treatment

Lake Townsend, Lake Higgins reservoirs

Like every U.S. municipal supply, Greensboro's water is disinfected and monitored against EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, published annually in the Consumer Confidence Report (CCR). If you want to read the raw report for yourself, our how to read your water quality report guide walks you through it line by line.

Water quality vs. water hardness — don't confuse the two

"Water quality" (is it safe to drink) and "water hardness" (how much scale it leaves) are entirely different things — and confusing them leads to bad purchases. Greensboro's water is soft (2.5 GPG), which has no bearing on its safety — hardness is a cosmetic and appliance concern, not a health one. For what that hardness costs you in scale, appliance wear, and water-heater efficiency, see the Greensboro water hardness page.

If contaminants concern you — add a drinking-water filter

Should you filter Greensboro's water?

The softener handles hardness; a drinking-water filter removes Chromium-6 and removes Pfas — if Greensboro's reported levels concern you. EPA / NTP: Chromium-6 (hexavalent chromium) is a known carcinogen when inhaled and is linked to stomach and intestinal tumors in drinking-water studies. EPA: PFAS ("forever chemicals") are linked to certain cancers, immune and thyroid effects, developmental issues, and elevated cholesterol. EPA MCL: 4 ppt for PFOA/PFOS. For a full breakdown of what each filter type removes, see best whole-house water filters.

See whole-house water filters →Point-of-use filters on Amazon

We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. This doesn't affect our recommendations. Full disclosure.

When to call a professional

Greensboro's water has Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) above the legal limit, so this is the one case where having a professional look at your tap — not just the city-wide average — is genuinely worth it. A licensed water-treatment specialist can test your home's water specifically, confirm whether your plumbing is contributing anything extra, and recommend a correctly-rated filter (for PFAS, a point-of-use reverse-osmosis or granular-activated-carbon system, for example).

Certified, independent results come from a state/province-licensed lab, not a company with a sales incentive — ask for a lab that reports to the EPA or your state.

Frequently asked questions

Is Greensboro tap water safe to drink?

Greensboro water has contaminant(s) above the legal limit. Review the breakdown below before drinking unfiltered.

Who tests Greensboro's water, and how often?

City of Greensboro Water Resources is required by the EPA to test and publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR), linked on this page.

Where does Greensboro drinking water come from?

Lake Townsend, Lake Higgins reservoirs

Should I filter Greensboro's tap water?

Yes — a filter rated for the specific contaminant(s) above the limit is worth considering. See the full breakdown for which one matters.

Is Greensboro water hard?

Greensboro water is soft at 2.5 GPG (43 ppm). Hardness is separate from safety — it affects scale and appliances, not health. See the Greensboro water hardness page for the full picture.

Sources & method

All contaminant levels are drawn from official, published data — EWG tap water database (Aug 2026) (source). We cite the legal limit for each contaminant so you never see a bare scare number.

Compare Greensboro to Other North Carolina Cities

How Greensboro's water quality stacks up against nearby cities — same North Carolina data, same legal limits.

Other Cities With Exceedances

Cities where a contaminant also runs above the legal limit — see how they compare to Greensboro.

Explore More

💧 Don’t rely on old numbers

These numbers change as new data comes out. Get notified when they get updated, and get our take on what to do about it. Unsubscribe anytime.

💧 Water treatment pros: this page is yours to share

This page helps customers understand what's in their water and whether they need a filter — so they can weigh whether service is worth it. We recommend sharing this page along with our complete contaminants guide in your next quote or follow-up to fully explain the value of your services.